DCI Lifts Instrumentation Restriction Rule
Drum Corps Internationals Board of Directors passed one of three
rules change proposals as a part of their Annual Meeting in San
Antonio, Texas on January 31. This rules change lifts the long-standing
restriction requiring com-peting units of the SUMMER MUSIC GAMES
to use G keyed bugles. Effective for the 1999 competitive season,
corps will now have the opportunity, as defined by the proposal,
to utilize brass bell-front valve instruments in any key with
the exception of sousaphones and trombones.
Submitted by Blue Devils Executive Director David Gibbs a nearly
unanimous vote approved the Multi-Key Instruments proposal by
a count of 173. Three abstentions were also recorded coming from
three of the four At-Large Directors. Additionally, two other
rules change proposals were submitted as a part of this meeting
but were defeated or withdrawn.
According to Gibbs, The primary intent of this latest rule change
is to ease the restrictive nature of the existing regulations
by offering more choice. Under no circumstances will a corps be
required to use instruments other than those they are now using
as a result of this change. Instead, those corps that choose to
explore other options in brass voicing may do so.
The vote was a part of a yearlong rules process that was researched
by the committees of the DCI Board of Directors and the DCI Instructors/
Judges Task Force. The rules proposals were then presented to
the Instructors caucuses in mid-January where they were approved
and forwarded to the DCI Board of Directors for the final stage
of the process.
Gibbs added, The DCI Board of Directors were satisfied with the
new rules process that allows for thoughtful and reasonable consideration
and as a result cast their vote on the three proposals. Although
we will likely see some experimentation throughout the next year
or two I do not anticipate any corps utilizing substantially different
instrumentation for some time. In almost all cases there will
be no impact on the visual character of the performances.
Ironically, this rule change somewhat preserves the root character
of the drum and bugle corps activity by specifically prohibiting
the use of trombones and sousaphones. Prior to todays rules change
the use of such instruments was permitted if pitched in the key
of G. In fact, Dr. David Kampschroer who is one of DCIs founding
fathers from 1971 as Director of the Blue Stars, points out, Clearly
the history of the activity has been evolutionary versus revolutionary.
After weighing the months of discussion and debate on this issue
I do not feel as though this latest rule change jeopardizes the
unique qualities of the activity nor does it counter the spirit
of the founding fathers. Dr. Kampschroer currently serves as
Director of Programs of the Phantom Regiment and voted in support
of the proposal.
Of the two remaining rules change proposals submitted only one
was formally discussed and brought to a vote by the delegates.
Submitted by YEA! Executive Director George Hopkins, these remaining
proposals focused on electronic amplification and the use of electronic
instruments. Recognizing that the use of electronic instruments
without electronic amplification is impractical, the last proposal
up for ratification was withdrawn by Mr. Hopkins after the proposal
to allow the use of electronic amplification was defeated by a
1012 vote.
Initially, five proposals were considered by Instructors and Judges
throughout the DCI community as a part of the DCI Instructors/Judges
College held in Chicago just two weeks ago. After involving the
advisory input of DCI Instructors/Judges Task Force, however,
only three of these five rules change proposals were submitted
to the Board of Directors for ratification. Those proposals addressing
Audience Judging and Unit Size did not meet the criteria for further
consideration by the Board of Directors as dictated by the DCI
Rules Change Process.
The Process
This rule change is the result of months of debate as part of
an updated rules change process developed by the DCI Board of
Directors over the past 2 years. Designed to create a series of
checks and balances by formally engaging Instructors and Judges,
and informally fans and participants, the 1999 DCI Rules Change
Process described below was used to bring about the latest DCI
rules change.
October 1
Deadline for submitting Rule Change Proposals. The Rules Committee
chairperson is responsible to receive all proposals, review for
completeness and prepare for distribution to the Rules Committee
members. Incomplete proposals will be immediately returned to
the submitter without any further review. Each proposal will be
assigned to an individual member of the Rules Committee to ensure
that all questions/challenges are answered. This coordinator
would contact the submitter for any additional information. Coordinators
will also seek input from the various committees of DCI.
October 27
Rules Committee Coordinators return all assigned proposals along
with research reports to the Chairperson. All completed proposals
will then be distributed to the Rules Committee members for review.
November 15
The Rules Committee reviews the proposals for potential impact
to the judges and the judging system, logistics for show promoters,
operational changes for the DCI office and a recommended time
and plan for implementation. Each proposal will be assigned to
the appropriate caption (visual, brass, percussion or guard) caucus
for discussion and voting at the annual DCI Instructors/Judges
College. Rules proposals may be rejected by the committee on the
basis of insufficient data/research or lack of clarity to the
proposal.
December 1
All reviewed and approved proposals are distributed to judges,
corps directors and instruct-ional staff members for their review.
At this time, representatives of each interest group shall be
consulted by the corps directors and staffs.
January Instructors/Judges College
Each proposal is discussed, debated and voted on in the appropriate
caption meetings for advance-ment to the full Instructors/Judges
caucus. Full caucus vote will result in the proposal being rejected
or passed on to the DCI Board of Directors.
Voting:
Each drum corps present at the Instructors/Judges College will
have one vote per caption. A simple majority vote of qualified
votes at the college will pass the proposal on to a vote by the
DCI Board of Directors.
February Board of Directors Meeting
Those proposals receiving a favorable majority vote of the DCI
Board of Directors will be scheduled for implementation based
on the recommended time frame and process previously determined
by the Rules Committee.
copyright 1999 drum corps international